<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Helping Small Business help themselves - Network Solutions - Latest Comments in On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://solutionsarepower.disqus.com/</link><description>Network Solutions community listening post and enabling conversation between experts and small business</description><atom:link href="https://solutionsarepower.disqus.com/on_the_ubiquity_of_twitter_handles/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:39:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8136259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do agree that consistency is the key because it doesn't lead to confusion when people are trying to remember you. Besides, if you got one shiny twitter handle that retains into people's mind then might as well maintain it right?!&lt;br&gt;by the way...this is a great post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Print Banners </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:39:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8088416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Molly -- You raise a related question -- how handles/nicks relate to your real name. If you have a relatively common name, or one "taken" by someone famous, the handle/nick route may be a way to go, as a way to point people to your real name.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joelogon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8088401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrea -- having people know you by your handle and your real name is a good thing. I see that you're the first google hit for "immunity andrea" (no quotes), so your handle can reinforce your real name. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joelogon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8088366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Teri -- kind of sneaks up on you, doesn't it? Funny how only recently that we started using the "personal brand" label and making a religion out of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joelogon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8088266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, ubiquity and consistency are powerful tools. Best to grab your name where you can.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Network Solutions</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8074054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use infolode in all my communications except very personal ones. It's my brand and I try to keep it authentic as well as friendly, though I know I've slipped a few times. &lt;br&gt;Great article. I arrived here via Twitter so I guess it works. :-)&lt;br&gt;Molly&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">infolode</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:45:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8064831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do identify myself by my twitter handle, but that is only because it is a condensed version of a older handle that I have been using for as long as I can remember. I used others, but immunity is the one that stuck. The good thing is, that most people know me by my real name and immunity is just the added bonus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">immunity</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8064611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely identify with my Twitter handle.  Since the mid-90's when I chose my AOL username, I've tried to use the same name on all things Internet that required registration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only recently did I realize that username has become my personal Internet "brand."  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tericee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Ubiquity of Twitter Handles</title><link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=1181#comment-8062361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use my Twitter handle, but that's partially because I was lucky enough to get it everywhere.  If you want to find me on IM, Skype, Twitter, LinkedIn, or just about anywhere else "caseysoftware" works.  Consistency is key.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I even have it on MSN where I have no contacts.  ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Casey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:51:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>